Most Certainly an Unpopular View
Administrative note: I haven't blogged for the past few days because our Internet connection has been down since Friday morning. We ended up having to buy Internet service from a second provider as back-up, since our first provider hasn't been able to resolve the problem.
For those unacquainted, Process is a social worker who blogs about her life as a CWS worker. Although I have a certain amount of respect for her because she does a very tough job, much of the time she and I don't see eye to eye.
Yesterday, she authored a post, An Unpopular View, that comes as a follow-up to the recent survey that revealed the obvious news that foster parents aren't paid enough. In her post, Process opined that she believes the best foster families are the ones who are willing to make sacrifices for their foster children.
Frankly, her opinion pisses me off.
I see nothing particularly noble about suffering or sacrifice. Foster parents do the right thing for their kids because it's the right thing to do. However, they shouldn't be sucked into financial difficulties because the government isn't holding up their part of the deal.
I think that most foster parents make sacrifices on a daily basis for their kids. I know we've made plenty of sacrifices for our child. We've had to cut back on our work schedule, we've had to deal with acting-out behaviors, we've had to go to numerous doctor, psychological, and court appointments. We don't get to have fun as a couple any more. We are home schooling our daughter because our local school district can't or won't give her the services she needs. Every time we ask our county for help, they refuse to do their job. They send their checks late, don't get mental health services for kids (or families) in crisis, and they treat foster parents as if they are an evil necessity, rather than as valued members of a professional team.
I think that we've made plenty of sacrifices for our daughter of our time and emotional energy. We should not have to reach into our own pockets and pay for things that the county should be covering. They are the ones that disrupted her life by removing her. They owe her services to get her life back on track. They were the ones that chose to become involved in the first place, so they need to finish the job.
This is a money thing, pure and simple. Foster families should be reimbursed for their actual out-of-pocket costs, period. If a kid needs braces, punches a hole in their wall, or steals a car, the county should reimburse them for damages. If a foster parent loses wages because they have to go to appointments or appear in court, they should be reimbursed for that, too. It's only fair to ask the county to pay a share of the foster family's housing, utility and food costs that are used by the foster child.
Asking for a commitment is fair. Asking a family to put their financial future on the line is not.
Yondalla posted a reply to Process' post. It's far more thoughtful, well-written and articulate than anything I could put together on this subject. All I can really say about Yondalla's post is, yeah, what she said.
5 comments:
As a foster kid who had to wait on NEEDED items because "payments" hadn't been recieved, I'm another unpopular opinion because I don't agree with payments.
Personally, I think all social workers should spend a month or two on the other side of the fence. Perhaps a reality check would be helpful.
I received much less than foster parents (although SSI for Elcie helped make up the difference). We couldn't have done it otherwise and the girls would have spent their entire lives in foster care.
I never said that foster parents shouldn't be fully reimbursed. In an ideal system, they would be. The fact is, though, that they're not, and how foster parents handle that is an indicator, I think, of their level of commitment. Sacrifice is nothing more or less than putting the child first, before oneself, the child's needs before one's own, and having someone in his/her life who is willing and able to do that is absolutely essential, I think, to the growth and well-being of every child. It seems you disagree.
Anyway, as Girlspeak says, it's a problem when foster parents won't, for example, front the money for clothes for a kid who arrives at their home without any. It's a problem when foster parents won't pay $10 for a kid to go on a field trip. It's a problem when foster parents won't drive a kid halfway on a weekend (when social workers aren't available) to meet the kid's brother for a visit.
IMO, if you don't have the financial security to put a $100 worth of clothes for a kid on your credit card until the clothing check comes in, pay for a kid to go on a field trip, or fill your car with gas to drive a kid somewhere, you have no business being a foster parent.
Ditto to Process...
"IMO, if you don't have the financial security to put a $100 worth of clothes for a kid on your credit card until the clothing check comes in.... you have no business being a foster parent."
As a foster parent, if I were to receive a child into my home today, I would not see the first check until the END on NOVEMBER. So I buy $100.00 worth of clothes on credit for this child. A week later, another child comes into my home, so I do the same thing. Maybe two weeks later, I do the same thing again, and the 1st child goes to a relative. Now I am $300.00 in debt and there is no guarantee that I will get reimbursed from the state. It would never end and I would always be in debt. The credit card company is not going to care whether or not I got paid!
I am all for inclusion and making any child feel like they are a part of your family, but you should also be more realistic than that!
Post a Comment